Note to Scottish Government Ministers
on proposals for legislation in favour of homosexual ‘marriage’ unions
The Synod of
the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland passed a motion in May 2012 which
authorised the Religion and Morals Committee to make representations to the
Scottish Government minister in the event of any proposed future Bill which
would legislate in favour of marriage between homosexuals. As Convener of the
Committee I am grateful to my MSP Dr Alasdair Allan for arranging this meeting with
the Deputy First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon MSP who announced the proposal of a
Bill on this issue.
This brief
note sets out the scriptural reasons which oppose in principle any Bill which
would have the effect of legalising homosexual marriage. While the terms of a
Bill have not yet been proposed and while the consultation on such a Bill might
have the effect of further changing the terms of any enactment, this note sets
out the principled opposition of the Church to the theory of homosexual
marriage from an exclusively Biblical perspective.
The unique position of the Church
The Free
Presbyterian Church of Scotland does not consider itself, nor does it at any
time wish the Scottish Government to consider it to be a mere lobby group or
voluntary body with a distinct set of opinions. We assert our claim to
represent the Reformation Church of Scotland which has always bound itself to
the teaching of Scripture on social, moral and political issues affecting the
community or the Church within it.
Lord MacKay
of Clashfern addressing a Synod of Bishops of the Church of England in words
equally if not more applicable to the Free Presbyterian Church in the Scottish
context, made the following important statement with which we entirely agree:
“When the Church speaks on a social
issue its responsibility is to apply that wisdom (of the oracles of God), after a careful consideration of
the relevant teaching of the Bible, to
the issues involved. I regard this as very different from a pressure group seeking to have its own opinion
accepted. The Church, in these circumstances, like its Divine Master, teaches with authority. The fact that it may
not be accepted by many people is nothing
new.”
An issue of public morality
It is our
firm conviction that homosexual marriage legislation would materially affect
public morals in this country. This is a very significant moral issue with
repercussions for the present and future generations. That it is considered by
the Scottish Government as an issue of morals is suggested in the terms used
when the planned bill was announced. The Scottish Government has decided that
to implement legislation is “right” and that not to do so would perpetuate
unfairness and inequality. This claim explicitly asserts that a moral standard
of right and wrong is being applied. We must earnestly press on our rulers that
the one and only absolute standard of morals is the law of God and that
homosexual marriage is at variance with it in a fundamental way.
That the
issue of homosexual marriage is viewed as a moral one is also suggested by the
fact that MSPs including Government Ministers, are to be given a “free vote” on
this legislation. Such an approach is usually reserved for clear matters of
conscience, such as abortion or euthanasia. We firmly contend that being a
matter of conscience homosexual marriage is an issue of morality. This being
so, the question immediately arises as to what the moral standard for
decision-making in this issue ought to be. Here the Scottish Government
displays its complete lack of moral direction in that every MSP is called on to
do what is right in his or her own eyes. Such moral relativism is to reject
morality altogether and makes the question one to be decided by numbers rather
than principles. A moral issue decided by force of numbers in a Parliament or
indeed in an electorate renders the decision process an amoral one.
Scripture reasons opposing homosexual
unions
There is but
one ordinance of marriage known to man and recognised in civil societies and
the distinction between civil and religious marriage is neither accurate nor
legally legitimate. Marriage according to the Bible was instituted by God and
does not belong to any State, democratic opinion or representative government
in any nation. The nature and regulation of marriage is given in the Bible with
sufficient clarity that every nation may recognise it and order its affairs to
preserve it, as has been done in all civilised communities from the beginning
of time. The present proposed changes are neither civilised, natural or legally
legitimate and, it is our firm contention, they are utterly unbiblical.
1. The
scriptural model and standard for marriage is the marriage of the first man and
the first woman by God in the Garden of Eden when it was inculcated for mankind
to the end of time “therefore shall a man leave his father and mother and shall
cleave unto his wife, and they shall be one flesh.” (Genesis 2:24) In this we
are clearly taught that:
a) a man should only be married to a
woman – his wife.
b) when a man and a woman are joined
together in marriage they become one flesh before
God
c) every member of the human race
has a father and mother who ought to be one flesh
in marriage
d)
there is no other relationship recognised as equivalent to marriage by
scripture - only the union of a man and a woman as one flesh
e)
the union of a man with another man or a woman with another woman is not a
union whereby they are one flesh and therefore is not marriage
2. Although
unions other than the only legitimate marriage union were known to be practiced
and are referred to in the Bible, the scriptural definition of these other
unions is that they are, in varying degrees sinful. The homosexual union is
especially described and depicted as sinful being an abomination to God.
a)
the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah were guilty of forming and practicing the
union of men with men and are described for this as sinners before the Lord
exceedingly and for their sin they and their cities were destroyed with fire as
an example to all following generations. (Genesis 13:13, 18:20, 19:1-29 and 2
Peter 2:6)
b) the practice of homosexual
relations is described as “uncleanness,” as the “dishonouring of the body,” as “vile affections,” as “against
nature,” as “unseemly,” as being given
over to a “reprobate mind” and as “not convenient (or unfitting)” and they that do such things are declared by God
to be “worthy of death” (Romans 1:24-32)
c) those who were once guilty of the
sin of homosexual uncleanness and who were converted
to the Christian faith are described in the Bible as having been “washed” and “sanctified” and their former sin is
depicted as including them being “effeminate” and
“abusers of themselves with mankind” (1 Corinthians 6:9)
3. While many
sins are described in the Bible as especially hateful to God and while the
Bible clearly teaches that those living in homosexual relations may find
repentance, forgiveness and reformation, yet it identifies such solemn
judgements against this sin and describes it in such dreadful terms that all
should fear it and flee from it as especially provoking to God.
It follows
that any Government legislation designed to create a marriage relation between
homosexuals is contrary to the teaching of scripture and is against the moral
law of God. It is for this reason that the Church must and will stand firmly
against any such legislation and must continue to declare the mind of God in
relation to this particular sin.
Other scripture reasons against the
proposal
There are
further scriptural reasons for our decided protest against any proposed
legislation:
1. The process of consultation on what is a
moral issue was itself immoral and deeply flawed in principle as well as being
flawed in the actual implementation. It is our belief that the Scottish
Government is increasingly working within a moral vacuum in matters of social
policy. What is perceived to be the voice of the people obtains and directs in
the making of laws. We reject this standard of morality utterly and warn that
to make laws on this basis will be most dangerous for our nation. We therefore
do not and cannot join with those who have called for a referendum on this
important moral issue. No democratic voice, however strong, can ever justify an
immoral law.
2. The proposals are destructive of the
scriptural relations between Church and State which are enshrined in our
constitution. We recommend to the Scottish Government the relation between
Church and State which was established at the Reformation, confirmed at the
Glorious Revolution and embodied for all time coming in the Act of Security
contained in the Treaty of Union. If adopted in the 21st century,
the Establishment Principle would protect the Church of Christ, ensuring that
it was assisted and promoted by the Government. The Reformed Church would in
turn provide moral direction in matters affecting the nation. This is the only
safe relationship with the Church which the present Scottish Government should
contemplate. The equivocation and plainly unscriptural decisions on moral
issues emanating from the present National Church, make it all the more
necessary for the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland to prayerfully place
before our rulers and lawmakers the teaching of the Word of God on this and
similar important moral issues.
3. The proposal will undermine the ability of
the Church to solemnise marriages which use a schedule that recognises
homosexual marriage. The Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland presently has
a place on a list of Churches whose office-bearers are entitled by law to
solemnise marriages and to sign the marriage schedule in its present form. Any
alteration to this arrangement or to the schedule so contrary to the biblical
principles of those immediately involved and which is likely to fatally compromise
their ability to continue in this function with good conscience may render
necessary a separate ecclesiastical registration of marriages. The Free
Presbyterian Church of Scotland considers the proposals for change to be so
extreme that legal action and judicial review will of necessity be an option
open to them as interested parties in this issue.
We therefore
most solemnly urge the Scottish Government to abandon its proposals for these
scriptural reasons and to legislate for the promotion and preservation of
marriage as God’s ordinance, defined, protected and honoured by Him in the
Bible. We vehemently protest against any forthcoming legislation destructive of
biblical marriage and refuse to recognise its legitimacy at any level.
On behalf of
the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland
David
Campbell September
2012